You might have heard this before, but the S&P 500 gained again last week, with many more new highs across the board. Sparking the rally was hope for progress on an agreement with Iran, but we’ve been here before. Still, oil fell 10% last week as traders remained optimistic we would see some movement toward an eventual resolution.
This is now the S&P 500’s longest weekly win streak since late 2023. Looking ahead to next week, the index hasn’t been up 10 weeks in a row since 1985!
We remain bullish, but the S&P 500 is already up 10% for the year and has seen a historic rally the past two months, so a well-deserved pause or consolidation would be perfectly normal.
Looking at what’s happened after prior nine-week rallies, it is perfectly normal to see continued strength. In fact, the S&P 500 was up a month later nine out of 10 times, which suggests June might keep things rolling. A year later, the S&P 500 was higher eight out of 10 times with a median increase of 12%, a very solid number.
What a Rally
After the historic 10% rally in April, the S&P 500 added another 5% in May. This was the second-best April/May return ever, with only the 17.8% rally in 2020 coming in better. The S&P 500 has gained double digits over these two months only four times, and the June that followed was never lower. In fact, the rest of the year was always up at least 14%.
What About June?
June historically is one of the weaker months of the year, but especially in a midterm year. In fact, no month has worse performance in midterm years, down 2.1% on average. After the rally we’ve seen, just be aware that a break and a June swoon could be quite possible.
Now, the other side is the stats we shared above, which all support a higher June. And consider this: June has been higher nine of the past 10 years, so over the past decade, it is one of the best months. The bottom line? Momentum is still strong and this bull market is alive and well. Any weakness should be fairly contained, and we believe higher prices are still coming in 2026.
Consumer Spending Is Humming, But There’s a Catch (Actually Two)
Inflation has been a big story recently, especially since the U.S.-Iran war started. We’ve pointed out that inflation was a growing problem even prior to the war and isn’t limited to an energy shock. Yet, the energy shock and higher prices at the pump are how inflation has been most salient for households. There was a school of thought that this would crimp consumer spending, or what economists call “consumption.” We didn’t think so. and the most recent data bears that out.
There’s no slowdown in consumption—not even close. Consumer spending rose at an annualized pace of 9% over the last three months. If you’re surprised by strong corporate revenue and profit numbers, look no further. How do you think companies will do if consumer spending is running at this pace! Consumer spending is now up 5.9% from a year ago, not far from the 2023-24 pace of 6.4% and above the pre-pandemic (2018-19) pace of 4.0%.
Here’s the catch: All this is before adjusting for inflation. Spending looks more benign once inflation is taken into account. A couple of examples here:
- Gasoline and other fuel sales rose at a whopping 167% annualized pace over the last three months, but once you adjust for inflation, that number falls to minus-5%. In other words, consumers spent a lot more at the pump but bought fewer gallons of gasoline and diesel.
- Grocery store sales (excluding alcohol) rose at a 2.7% annualized pace over the last three months, but it’s flat once you adjust for inflation. People spent more on groceries but didn’t increase the amount of stuff they buy.
Coming back to the aggregate story, nominal consumption rose at an annualized pace of 6.3% in April, but once you adjust for inflation, “real” consumption rose just 1.3%. That’s weak, but one-month readings can be noisy, and it helps to look at the broader picture.
As we noted at the top, nominal consumption grew at an annualized pace of 9% over the past three months, but prices were up 6% over this period using PCE inflation, the Fed’s preferred measure. After adjusting for inflation, real spending rose 2.8% and is up 2.1% over the past year. While that is a big drop-off from the strong 3.6% pace we saw in 2023-24, it’s comparable to the pre-pandemic pace of 2.2%.
One big driver of strong sales over the last three months (actually February-March) was a rebound in auto sales, which had pulled back significantly at the end of 2025. We may not see such a strong pace going forward, but it’s still notable that sales rebounded. It tells you that consumers are still able to make big-ticket purchases. Consumers aren’t really pulling back their volume of purchases despite higher inflation. They’re increasing the quantity of goods and services consumed at a steady rate, but also resigned to paying higher prices for these items. Of course, that’s a big benefit to company top and bottom lines.
The real question is how consumers are funding their consumption.
Real Incomes Are Falling Amid Higher Inflation
As we’ve highlighted quite often over the last three years, the economy has been doing well because aggregate income growth (income growth of all households) has been strong, powering consumption. However, personal income growth has been easing since 2025, and elevated inflation means real income growth is weak.
Disposable income, which is aggregate after-tax income, is up a paltry 1.4% annualized over the past three months, and it’s up only 2.6% over the past year. For perspective, the 2023-24 pace was 6.7% while the 2018-2019 pace was 4.7%.
Disposable income can be impacted by idiosyncratic items like farm incomes (which can be volatile depending on the inflow of government assistance) and government transfer payments (like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid). It helps to isolate the largest component within disposable income: employee compensation across all workers in the economy. Compensation rose at an annualized pace of 2.9% over the last three months and is up 3.6% over the past year, well off the 5.9% pace we saw in 2023-24 and 4.2% pace in 2018-19.
The problem is twofold: 1) Income growth is slowing, and 2) all the numbers above are in nominal terms, and things look worse once you account for inflation.
Inflation ran at a slightly slower pace in 2023-24, and on top of that, disposable income and compensation growth ran well ahead of it, which means real income growth was strong. Income growth in 2018-19 wasn’t as strong, but inflation was even lower, and so real income growth was relatively strong back then, too. That dynamic has now completely reversed over the past year—income growth is slowing, and hotter inflation means there’s even more downward pressure on real income growth. As you see in the chart below, the yellow bars (inflation) are now taller than the blue and green bars.
If you look at real personal income excluding government transfers, the pace slowed to a crawl in 2025 and is now in a clear downtrend. It fell 3.4% (annualized) over the last three months as inflation strengthened and is down 1.0% over the last 12 months.
- Compare that to a 3% annual pace in 2023-24.
- Over the entire 2020-24 period, real incomes ex transfers grew at a 2.3% annualized pace.
The current pullback in real incomes is starting to look like the pullback in the first half of 2022, when it fell at an annualized pace of 3.4%. That was also because inflation was picking up.
So, What’s Funding Consumption?
Nominal consumption is running hot, and even after adjusting for inflation, spending is quite steady. However, real income growth is falling, and that begs the question of how households are funding consumption. There are a couple of answers:
- 1) Tax refunds.
- 2) They’re saving a lot less.
The tax refund impact is obviously temporary, so let’s focus on the second one: the declining savings rates.
The savings rate has collapsed over the past year, from 5.5% a year ago to 2.6% now. The savings rate is now close to the lowest levels we’ve seen over the last 30 years, including the 2005-07 period and 2022. This “savings rate” is the difference between income and consumption outlays, expressed as a percent of disposable income. Think of it as the aggregate amount of income that was not spent on consumption (as a percent of disposable income).
By itself, a falling savings rate is not too worrying. Low real wage growth is the real worry (and elevated inflation more than anything else).
Savings rates tend to go down during economic expansions and when consumers “feel wealthy”—for example, when the stock market goes up and increases household wealth. We saw a similar dynamic in 1998-99, when the savings rate collapsed from 7% to about 3.5%. Even in 2005-07, home prices were rising and so that “wealth effect” likely led to very low savings rates.
It’s usually when the economy slows down, or there’s a recession, that the savings rate goes up, as households pull back on spending. The 2010s were bit of an anomaly here because the savings rate rose across the decade, from 5.3% at the end of 2009 to 6.9% in 2019. That’s because households were trying to rebuild their balance sheets after the housing bubble burst and stocks crashed in 2008-09.
The current drop in savings rates is clearly a response to higher inflation, as in 2022. Back in 2022, consumers drew down their “stock” of excess savings (from lower spending during COVID and stimulus checks). Right now, consumers clearly feel they can “afford” to save less because of stronger household balance sheets (thanks to higher stock prices and home prices), which is why they’re not pulling back on volumes.
Of course, this does raise the risk that a decline in asset prices—whether home prices or stock prices—could reverse the wealth effect and lead to lower consumption. That could lead to lower business revenues and profits, resulting in a cycle of layoffs and higher unemployment. In turn, that would lead to lower aggregate income growth and consumption. That’s the negative feedback loop that ultimately results in a recession.
The economy and the stock market may now be more closely tied at the hip than we think, and that’s even without getting into the impact of AI on both. But if the stock market continues to rise (while experiencing normal ups and downs), consumers will likely be willing to see past current inflation and not lower the quantity of their purchases, meeting higher prices by reducing their savings rate.
S&P 500 – A capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
The NASDAQ 100 Index is a stock index of the 100 largest companies by market capitalization traded on NASDAQ Stock Market. The NASDAQ 100 Index includes publicly traded companies from most sectors in the global economy, the major exception being financial services.
The views stated in this letter are not necessarily the opinion of Cetera Wealth Services LLC and should not be construed directly or indirectly as an offer to buy or sell any securities mentioned herein. Investors cannot invest directly in indexes. The performance of any index is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not take into account the effects of inflation and the fees and expenses associated with investing.
A diversified portfolio does not assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market.
8954373.1-0626-C
