Using Rationale While Investing

Share Post: facebook Created with Sketch. twitter Created with Sketch. linkedin Created with Sketch. mail Created with Sketch. print Created with Sketch.

Published by Jake Bleicher and the Carson Wealth Investment Committee

A strategic wealth management plan often focuses on investment allocation. Empirical evidence suggests that asset allocation explains 91.5% of return variation over time (Brinson, Singer & Beebower 1991). By that logic, investors and advisors are correct in making the decision paramount. However, such a myopic view of the individual omits very real considerations. Incorporating behavioral finance into traditional strategic portfolio planning can help avoid costly emotional errors, which arguably are the biggest detractor to investment returns.

Traditional financial theory assumes all investors rationally process ALL information and make unbiased invest decisions. Thus, a strategic wealth plan is simply an optimized allocation to assets that pursue an investor’s return requirements while minimizing risk. Psychologists disagree; human beings are not always perfectly rational. Decisions often reflect emotional and cognitive biases. Even the most stoic investors cannot possibly process ALL available information, it would be impossible. Rather, they make sub-optimal but adequate decisions. Moreover, a majority of investors (aka human beings) are emotional. If they weren’t, the tech bubble at the turn of the century and the real estate bubble in 2007 would have never occurred. This is not a modern finance phenomenon; the tulip mania in 1637 predated Adam Smith by nearly a century. A perfectly rational investor would avoid such overpriced assets. The average equity investor underperformed the S&P 500 by 4.66% over a 20-year annualized horizon, predominately due to emotional biases (Dalbar 2015*). Certainly allocation is important, but 4.66% compounded over long periods of time amounts to an enormous shortfall. To be successful, investors and advisors must consider human nature a paramount risk when developing a strategic wealth plan.

A simple approach is to combine our innate desire to segment assets into different buckets with traditional asset allocation. Financial theory argues that mental accounting leads to sub-optimal investment allocations, ignoring correlations between asset classes and the fungibility of money. Who doesn’t consider an emergency fund as distinctly separate from a checking account or a 401K? It’s human nature. Rather than attempt to perfectly optimize the entire portfolio, allowing investors to create different “buckets” clearly defines which account is meant to meet each goal. After all, is a 401K not for retirement and an emergency fund, but for an emergency? This simplifies allocation decisions and helps prevent decisions made out of fear. Investors, and advisors, are more likely to stay the course if there is a clearly defined process.

While asset allocation, in theory, may predict 91.5% of expect returns, emotional errors tend to be the most damaging in reality. When developing a strategic portfolio management plan, clearly define which assets are meant to fund future goals. Having a conservative bucket to meet basic needs will reduce the likelihood of a damaging fire sale in the more aggressive aspirations bucket.

Contact A Carson Wealth Advisor Today

 

Share:
facebook Created with Sketch. twitter Created with Sketch. linkedin Created with Sketch. mail Created with Sketch. print Created with Sketch.
Share Post: facebook Created with Sketch. twitter Created with Sketch. linkedin Created with Sketch. mail Created with Sketch. print Created with Sketch.

RECENT POSTS

Let’s Talk About Midterm Elections and Your Investments

This week was midterm elections and we’ve had many questions about what it all could mean, which we’ll tackle in today’s blog. We consider it a great honor to vote, and while we may not know the final results of the election for days (or even months), what we do know is the election will …

3 Nontraditional Ways to Give That Still Qualify for a Tax Deduction

Kevin Oleszewski, Senior Wealth Planner ‘Tis the season to give. In fact, 37% of charitable giving occurs during the last quarter of the year — 20% of it in December alone, according to a survey conducted by the Blackbaud Institute. And while the holidays are traditionally a time to reflect …

Considering Tax Loss Harvesting? What You Need to Know First

Kevin Oleszewski, CFP® Senior Wealth Planner As the tax year draws to a close, many high-income investors will look to reposition their portfolios to intentionally generate losses as a way to offset gains — an investment strategy known as tax loss harvesting.
1 2 3 97 98 99

Get in Touch

In just 15 minutes we can get to know your situation, then connect you with an advisor committed to helping you pursue true wealth.

Schedule a Consultation